×
164
Fashion Jobs
EXTRAMARKS EDUCATION
Area Sales Manager- B2B Sales
Permanent · Nashik
TITAN BIOTECH LIMITED
Area Sales Manager
Permanent · Hyderabad
OPERA CLOTHING PRIVATE LIMITED
Production Manager For Garment Manufacturing Factory
Permanent · Daman
LEVI'S
Associate Sap Ptp Business Analyst
Permanent · Bengaluru
FEDBANK FINANCIAL SERVICES LTD
Area Sales Manager For Gold Loan - Chennai
Permanent · Chennai
DR MEDITECH SURGICAL AND DIAGNOSTICS INDIA PVT LTD
Production Executive / Production Manager (Biochemistry & Hematology
Permanent · National Capital Region
INFEXN LABORATORIES PRIVATE LIMITED
Medical Representative/ Area Sales Manager
Permanent · Navi Mumbai
ELLIOTT MOSS
IT Sales Manager
Permanent · Mumbai
GRAND CHEMICAL WORKS
Area Sales Manager - Jaipur gt
Permanent · Kota
IGENETIC DIAGNOSTICS /HEALTH MAP DIAGNOSTIC PVT LTD
Area Sales Manager/Territory Manager
Permanent · Pune
RANDSTAD INDIA PVT LTD
Market Development Manager - Horeca Sales
Permanent · National Capital Region
SHREE HR SERVICES
Retail Sales Executive
Permanent · Varanasi
PEP TECHNOLOGIES PRIVATE LIMITED
Area Sales Executive / Area Sales Manager (Only From Skin Care)
Permanent · Bengaluru
MIDAS HYGIENE INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED
Area Sales Manager
Permanent · Hyderabad
WHITEHAT JR
Sales Manager India
Permanent · Faridabad
REFLECTOSAFE
Area Sales Manager - Delhi
Permanent · National Capital Region
REFLECTOSAFE
Area Sales Manager - Chennai
Permanent · Chennai
AQUAGENICS RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT INDIA PVT. LTD.
Area Sales Manager
Permanent · Pune
MUTHOOT FINCORP
Area Manager
Permanent · Tiruchirappalli
INFINIX
National Sales Manager
Permanent · MUMBAI
1MG
Sales Manager - Diagnostics
Permanent · National Capital Region
HALONIX TECHNOLOGIES PVT LTD
Area Sales Manager - Fans & Lighting / Retail Sales
Permanent · Ludhiana
By
Reuters
Published
Apr 1, 2022
Reading time
2 minutes
Share
Download
Download the article
Print
Click here to print
Text size
aA+ aA-

StockX strikes back at Nike in NFT lawsuit

By
Reuters
Published
Apr 1, 2022

Online reseller StockX LLC said in a court filing Thursday that images of Nike sneakers it sells as non-fungible tokens do not violate Nike Inc trademarks, arguing that Nike had shown a "fundamental misunderstanding" of NFTs by suing StockX last month.


Reuters



StockX in the Manhattan federal court filing called Nike's lawsuit a "baseless and misleading" attempt to interfere with the popular secondary market for its sneakers. It said it was only using NFTs to authenticate its physical shoes and was not selling them as standalone products.

The digital assets called NFTs have recently exploded in popularity, and intellectual-property lawsuits over them have begun to hit U.S. courts, including disputes involving Miramax and Quentin Tarantino, Hermes, and rapper Lil Yachty.

Nike sued StockX in February for selling NFTs of images of Nike sneakers without the shoe giant's permission, arguing they infringed its trademarks by causing consumer confusion. The lawsuit also said StockX's NFTs interfered with Nike's own NFT plans.

StockX countered in its answer to the lawsuit Thursday that its use of NFTs was "no different than major e-commerce retailers and marketplaces who use images and descriptions of products to sell physical sneakers and other goods, which consumers see (and are not confused by) every single day."

According to StockX, its NFTs are merely "claim tickets" to access physical shoes stored in a "vault" after a buyer purchases them, and provide proof of ownership and authenticity.
StockX said the tokens make it easier to trade shoes stored in the vault, and that the NFTs are "absolutely not 'virtual products' or digital sneakers" as Nike claimed.

The NFTs are not likely to cause confusion because StockX makes it clear to buyers that they are tied to tracking the physical shoes, StockX said. It said Nike's lawsuit threatens others who use NFTs to track the ownership of physical goods like fine art, whiskey and wine.

Nike and one of its attorneys did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
The case is Nike Inc v. StockX LLC, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, No. 1:22-cv-00983.

© Thomson Reuters 2022 All rights reserved.